[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mineral needs
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Scott McLaughlin wrote:
> I still would like to know though, if anyone has
> determined wether Ca and Mg are more valuable to plants than Na and K. If so
> what ratio of these two sets of ions is the most beneficial?
Ca++, Mg++ and K+ are all essential to plant growth. Na+ is not. Of
these three, I think that plant composition indicates they are used in the
order K+ > Ca++ > Mg++, though I don't suppose this necessarily reflects
the order in which they need to be present in the environment.
K is the most likely to be in short supply because it's used in large
amounts relative to the usual supply. Ca++ is often present in excess
(except in very soft water) and any Na+ is superfluous. If the exchanger
could pull either of these and replace them with K+, then fine. If Ca++
and Mg++ are instead replaced by Na+ (the usual pattern for cation
exchangers) then don't bother.