[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: re: Biowheels-CO2-plants redux

To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
Subject: Re: re: Biowheels-CO2-plants redux
From: busko at stsci_edu (Ivo Busko)
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:46:58 -0400 (EDT)

Dan Dixon wrote:

<snip>
>I enjoyed the rant and agree with the point (i.e., tracking changes is more
>important than absolute accuracy). I am just wanting a test kit that is more
>sensitive than the AP thing I have, which measures in 20ppm increments (and
>that never reads even to 20ppm). The Tetra kit Karen mentioned that reads
>12.5ppm increments still seems too insensitive. Is the SeaTest kit able to
>measure in 1 or 2ppm increments between zero and about 15 or 20ppms? I read
>somewhere that about 6ppm is the ideal level for plants. Opinions?
<snip>

Read my comment on the Tetra test at

http://www.actwin.com/fish/aquatic-plants/month.9908/msg00418.html

-Ivo Busko

Prev by Date: Evolution or Creationism
Next by Date: Re: Yippie or Taking unfair advantage
Prev by thread: Evolution or Creationism
Next by thread: Re: Yippie or Taking unfair advantage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread