[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ARO Needle Valves vs. Nupro
You actually have one other option. I use a Hoke for the valve on my CO2 setup,
and absolutely love it. Very easy to set, smooth operation, stays set, is able to
close completely (or at least completely enough for our needs), has marks on the
knob and the barrel so you can reset it with no fiddling if it gets bumped,
all-around very high quality. Let me know if you want more info.
> Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 00:13:02 EDT
> From: BOLLING37 at aol_com
> Subject: ARO Needle Valves vs. Nupro
> Hello all,
> It seems like a lot of people are having trouble with their ARO needle
> The valves cannot be closed completely enough to allow for good control over
> flowrate. Check the archives of this list: there are several people who have
> had this problem. OTOH, the Nupro model is said to have a small set screw
> which can be adjusted to allow the valve to be closed more tightly, giving
> more than adequate control over the flowrate. This valve was discontinued,
> and replaced by a similar valve. Is anyone currently using this new valve?
> Does it provide good flowrate
> control, say 1 bubble every 3 seconds? Does it also have a set screw like the
> original model spoken of at the Krib? After hearing about all the trouble
> are having with the ARO valves, I don't want to fool with them.