fw:Re: High CO2
To: aquatic-plants at actwin_com
Subject: fw:Re: High CO2
From: "shaji (s.) bhaskar" <bhaskar at bnr_ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 1995 12:57:00 -0400
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 (2)
X400-Received: by mta bnr.ca in /PRMD=BNR/ADMD=TELECOM.CANADA/C=CA/; Relayed; Sun, 16 Jul 1995 13:00:28 -0400
X400-Received: by /PRMD=BNR/ADMD=TELECOM.CANADA/C=CA/; Relayed; Sun, 16 Jul 1995 13:00:23 -0400
X400-Received: by /PRMD=BNR/ADMD=TELECOM.CANADA/C=CA/; Relayed; Sun, 16 Jul 1995 12:57:00 -0400
Forwarded from stevensj.
Shaji Bhaskar bhaskar at bnr_ca
BNR, 35 Davis Dr., RTP, NC 27709, USA (919) 991 7125
From: stevensj at calshp_cals.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: High CO2
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 95 8:47:22 CDT
Mailer: Elm [revision: 220.127.116.11]
> Subject: HELP! High CO2
> I am not sure what happened to Joanne's tank, though I suspect that she was
>playing with different buffering systems using peat, a Seachem buffer of
>unknown origin, and and the carbonate buffering system familiar to us users of
>supplemental CO2. I would question the reliability of CO2 reading under these
I agree that mixing buffers was not a good idea & I won't be trying that again!
> What ever the cause, I question some of your advice.
> >> TRY: I would immediately lower the PH to BELOW 7.0 to *reduce* the
>toxicity level of the Ammonia (I would say 6.7-6.7). Ammonia is less toxic at
>lower PH levels (below 7.0). <<
> >> Suspend use of your CO2 injector completely for now. <<
> While it is true that the ammonium present at a pH below neutral is less
>toxic than ammonia, (and more easily used by the plants) if you want her to
>suspend use of supplemental CO2, how do you propose that she go about lowering
>the pH in the tank?
I just wanted to comment that removal of the CO2 system & a 30% water change
(though this was with hard, alkaline tap water) did seem to help at first
since the fish no longer hovered at the surface, but a few hours later two
> Also, I'd like to point out that on a tank adjusted to steady application of
>supplemental CO2, the change to no supplemental CO2 is adding yet another
>instability to an already unstable environment.
> While Joanne's 40ppm of CO2, (if it really was that high, considering the
>other chemicals in the "brew" at that point) while high was not out of the
>range considered to be tolerable to most fish. I suspect it was the rapid
>change in the amount of CO2, and the resultant rapid pH shift that caused her
>fish distress, along with whatever decay process caused her ammonia level to
>spike and, probably, her O2 levels to fall as well.
I am pretty sure that the 40 ppm reading was accurate. I am sure that this
is what caused the fish to hover at the surface, the only other thing I can
think may have been a problem was too low O2. I measured nitrite in that tank
that morning & it was normal. After the water change & fish deaths it became
elevated. In that same tank this morning, before the lights turned on I
measured O2 and it was about 5ppm (lower than one of my tanks with UGF which
was about 8 ppm), CO2 was 17 ppm and nitrites are still elevated (ammonia is
zero though). I put on a pump with airstone to increase O2. I also put the
old yeast + sugar bottle on yesterday & I put new mixture in today to try to
keep the CO2 high (between 15 & 20 ppm hopefully) even though I have the
airstone on. I will monitor O2 levels. I think it will only be neccessary
to run the O2 at night, but I'll run it today as well, just to get the O2
up to 8 ppm.
> >> Making water changes aggrevated the situation by diluting the percentage
>(amount) of Nitro-Bacter in the water. <<
> Nitritrifying bacteria (whether we are discussing nitrobacter or
>nitrosomonas) are, to my knowledge, not free floating bacteria, but attached
>to a substrate. (be it aquarium gravel, plants or the glass walls themselves)
>Water changes unless in done with water toxic to the bacteria should not
>interfere with the nitrogen cycle.
I'm still not too sure what upset my nitrogen cycle - possibly the bacteria
were killed due to high CO2 just like two of the fish were (anyone know how
sensitive bacteria are to high CO2 levels?). I did notice yesterday, when
I did a partial water change and rinsed the filters in old water, that the
filters were quite gummed up (the buffer gave everything a slimy feel/coating).
> >> If you didn't rinse the Carbon Insert/Cartridge for the Powerfilter, that
>will also introduce Carbon Dust into the water, which creates Carbonic Acid.
I did rinse the carbon, but carbon is pretty inert. It is CO2 that reacts with
H2O to form carbonic acid.
> I have never heard that! This would mean that the carbon containing diatom
>filter powders would cause the same problem. I find this highly unlikely!