Re: Ophiopogon Japonicus, and plant list
>From: FERNANDEZ_ENRIQUE at Tandem_COM
>Date: 18 May 95 03:49:00 -0700
>Subject: Re: Ophiopogon Japonicus
>In the Aquatic Plants FAQ, Erik Olson includes both Acorus and
>Ophiopogon in a blacklist of not truly aquatic plants. I tried some
Could you point me to the correct Aquatic Plants FAQ? I can't seem to
find the blacklist information in the usual Plants FAQ at caltech.
>From: WORKINGSW at aol_com
>Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 15:34:24 -0400
>Subject: Re: Aquatic Plants Digest V1 #76
>in an aquarium. A good candidate for 6-week meltdown - perhaps more so than
>acorus, which can do OK in certain aquarium conditions. If you are willing
Unfortunately I have bought 8 of this Ophiopogon for US 10cents each. Plants
over here are cheap, 3 young E.Bleheri or E.Orisis cost only US 40cents. I
think I'll keep these Acorus and Ophiopogon until I can find some Anubias Nana
or those small E.Quadricostatus from the natural stream here. Can't find them
in the shop.
Also I have a question on the plant list at the KRIB. Example below:
Rotala Wallichii (B2,D,G,R,Y)
What does the above stand for? Where can I get the
lagend for it.
Text item: External Message Header
The following mail header is for administrative use
and may be ignored unless there are problems.
***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***.
Errors-To: Aquatic-Plants-Owner at actwin_com
Reply-To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
Subject: Aquatic Plants Digest V1 #77
To: Aquatic-Plants at ActWin_com
From: Aquatic-Plants-Owner at actwin_com
Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 15:39:02 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by looney.actwin.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id PAA0495
8 for Aquatic-Plants-Digest-Outgoing at ActWin_com; Thu, 18 May 1995 15:39:02 -0400
Received: from looney.actwin.com by ormail.intel.com with smtp
(Smail188.8.131.52 #7) id m0sCBWD-000UlhC; Thu, 18 May 95 12:46 PDT
Received: from ormail.intel.com by relay.jf.intel.com with smtp
(Smail184.108.40.206 #2) id m0sCBWM-000twVC; Thu, 18 May 95 12:46 PDT