[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Plantless Aquascapes
Re: bristlenose - agreed. Lots of folks migrate fish between tanks though,
But this does not negate a wonderful hardscape, does it? With
algaecide/excel/capping the substrate/scrubbing the hardscape and with
regular plantless maintenance, how is the maturity of the tank relevant?
Isn't this the appeal of a non-planted, light-for-fish-only tank?
(Original message got lost on the internets.)
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Stuart Halliday <stuart at mytriops_com>wrote:
> On 16/08/2011 20:20, carlo wrote:
>> I think water is necessary for an "aquascape" vs a "landscape."
>> You may have seen this wonderful plantless (but with fish) tank from ADG.
>> think this is still totally an aquascape without the fish:
> Can't see that albino bristlenose surviving long in that tiny tank....
> As usual, these display tanks are never kept up for more than a couple of
> Stuart Halliday
> 200 Million years in the making...
> Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com