[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APD] Interesting idea

To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
Subject: Re: [APD] Interesting idea
From: Jerry Baker <jerry at bakerweb_biz>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:02:31 -0700
In-reply-to: <453777D2.8030607@verizon.net>
List-help: <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=help>
List-id: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants.actwin.com>
List-post: <mailto:aquatic-plants@actwin.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20061018124746.66700.qmail@web30810.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <453692D6.6020003@verizon.net> <2F54C970-F4B6-4C8D-B9EE-F05DC66E1D0A@yahoo.com> <453777D2.8030607@verizon.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (Windows/20061018)

Dennis Dietz wrote:
> so, for fun again:
> ppm CO2= 3*kH*10exp(7-pH)
> = 3*5*10exp(1.1)
> =188.8

Correct. If you really have a KH of 5 degrees and a pH of 5.9, then your 
CO2 is 189ppm (assuming you're not filtering with peat, etc.).

-- 
Jerry Baker
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [APD] CO2 levels and why we care
  - From: Dennis Dietz

References:
- Re: [APD] Interesting idea
  - From: S. Hieber
- Re: [APD] Interesting idea
  - From: Dennis Dietz
- Re: [APD] Interesting idea
  - From: Vaughn Hopkins
- Re: [APD] Interesting idea
  - From: Dennis Dietz

Prev by Date: Re: [APD] Interesting idea
Next by Date: Re: [APD] CO2 levels and why we care
Previous by thread: Re: [APD] Interesting idea
Next by thread: Re: [APD] CO2 levels and why we care
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread