[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APD] Aquatic-Plants Digest, Vol 37, Issue 36

> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "S. Hieber" <shieber at yahoo_com>
> Subject: Re: [APD] Conductivity
> To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
> Why? Easy. The outcome is underdetermined by the facts in the
> case presented.

No, they are there.
Why would each case occur?

You do not need a set of pre existing information/facts in this
question to solve it.

There are 3 possible outcomes and possible (more if you are
wise, see DL's second question about CO2 above) responses to why
and justifications for each.
Simple question really:)
Not quite so simple answer.

Tom Barr

Public forums now open!! Have a local club banner? Send it! we
will place it in rotation!!

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com