[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Aquatic-Plants Digest, Vol 37, Issue 36
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "S. Hieber" <shieber at yahoo_com>
> Subject: Re: [APD] Conductivity
> To: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
> Why? Easy. The outcome is underdetermined by the facts in the
> case presented.
No, they are there.
Why would each case occur?
You do not need a set of pre existing information/facts in this
question to solve it.
There are 3 possible outcomes and possible (more if you are
wise, see DL's second question about CO2 above) responses to why
and justifications for each.
Simple question really:)
Not quite so simple answer.
Public forums now open!! Have a local club banner? Send it! we
will place it in rotation!!
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com