[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Article
Jerry Baker wrote:
> Stuart Halliday wrote:
>> I like the claims of near 100% efficiently, low heat and natural light
>> bandwidth.
>
> I wonder if they are capable of producing the intensities required for
> planted tanks, and a pleasing spectral distribution.
This article seems to be saying that OLEDs only produce 25 lumens per
watt. That is around 1/4th the efficiency of a good metal halide.
http://www.newscientisttech.com/article/dn8992-quantum-quest-leads-to-superefficient-lights.html
-----
ARTICLE TEXT FOR ARCHIVAL PURPOSES
-----
Quantum quest leads to super-efficient lights
* 18:47 12 April 2006
* NewScientist.com news service
* Tom Simonite
A light that lasts 20 times longer than a conventional bulb and is 75%
more energy efficient has been developed by researchers.
The light is based on organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) that use a
novel combination of photon-emitting compounds to convert more energy
into light than existing versions. It was created by Stephen Forrest
from Princeton University in New Jersey, and colleagues at the
University of Southern California, both in the US.
OLEDs can easily be printed onto different surfaces and could therefore
be used to illuminate buildings and homes in completely new and more
energy efficient ways, experts say.
John de Mello, who works on OLEDs at Imperial College London, UK, and
was not involved with the work, is impressed by the new work. "The
beauty of this approach is that it harvests the energy in a near-optimal
manner," he says.
De Mello adds that the OLEDs could make new methods of lighting
possible. "The industrial interest in these materials stems from their
ease of processing," he says. "They can be deposited over large areas at
relatively low cost."
Red, green and blue
OLEDs produce light using a layer of semi-conducting material made from
an organic compound. Passing a current through this layer raises the
energy level of electrons inside it and as these electrons return to
their previous energy they release photons.
The components can be made to produce different colours of light by
adding "dopant" materials to change the wavelengths of emitted photons.
Dopants that produce the right mix of red, green and blue light can be
combined to fine-tune a material to a particular colour.
Phosphorescent molecules are normally used as the dopant material in
OLEDs, as they release photons a steady rate and can be easily
fine-tuned. But the molecules only convert a limited number of photons
and some phosphorescent materials also tend to wear out rapidly.
Forrest and colleagues developed OLEDs that avoid both these problems,
harnessing all the photons up for grabs, and that use only
phosphorescent compounds that are long-lasting.
Singlets and triplets
They determined that OLEDs produce photons in one of two quantum spin
states - referred to "triplets" and "singlets" - and that the
phosphorescent material used in most OLEDs can only transmit triplets,
which comprise 75% of all photons.
So Forrest's team doped their OLEDs with fluorescent molecules as well
as phosphorescent ones. The fluorescent molecules convert photons
through a slightly different process, and can transmit singlets
efficiently. As the fluorescent material produces photons at a blue
wavelength, the researchers re-tuned the rest of the dopant material to
produce the necessary wavelengths for white light. "Using this
combination of fluorescence and phosphorescence means there's no waste,"
Forrest says.
The OLEDs developed by Forrest's team have a longer lifespan than
existing ones, because they use only longer lasting phosphorescent
compounds "This first model has a lifetime of around 20,000 hours,"
Forrest says.
By contrast, regular light bulbs - which supply about 40% of lighting in
the US - normally only last for around 1000 hours, while compact
fluorescent lights can last for around 10,000 hours. Lighting based on
the new OLED should also be more efficient than conventional bulbs -
they emit about 25 lumens per watt of energy, compared to about 15 for a
normal bulb.
--
Jerry Baker
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants