[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Estimative Index for CO Dosing - Bah!
On 3/8/06, Vaughn Hopkins <hoppycalif at yahoo_com> wrote:
> How can we tell that we have 20 ppm or 30 ppm or whatever CO2
> concentration, when the PH/KH/CO2 table isn't accurate due to other
> water parameters?
If you aren't adding a bunch of stuff that is measured by the KH kit then
the table is accurate enough in my opinion. YMMV.
I gotta say that I agree with a lot of what George said. I've kind of hit
the point that I am not so fond of pearling plants. I know that is heresy,
but it's true.
I had nicely growing plants and active fish. I set up a sort of "mist"
system and had mostly active fish (as in even my husband noticed a slight
but discernable difference in their activity levels) and pearling plants. I
noticed a couple of htings -- the first is that I was spending a lot more
time on tank maintenance; the second is that heaven forbid I let a dosing
day go by without dosing the tank. The consumption of nutrients went way
up, just like the growth rate of the plants.
And for what? I know some people get great delight from pearling plants. I
get great delight from beautiful plants and watching the antics of the fish
so I didn't get any major smiley factor out of wildly pearling plants.
So I've slacked back to lower levels of CO2. I'm not balancing on a knife
edge of plant/algae growth and don't have to pull out the machete to hack
back the jungle as often. And everything looks just fine.
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com