[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] solar tanks - Barr
Bill D wrote:
> Most if not all of those so called "savings" come at the expense of the
> taxpayers or rate payers.
> Solar and windmill and geothermal and landfill and soybean power , etc. are
> not economical by any measurement, and even if they were, they would produce
> only a small amount of the energy that we need. It is nice to dream, but
> dreaming doesn't solve problems.
> The only solution to our growing energy problem is to bite the bullet and
> start to build the next generation of nuclear plants. The professional
> naysayers have managed to block nuclear power for too long. The time for us
> to start making up for lost time is now.
I agree. Why waste time spending millions on subsidizing solar, wind,
and biomass power when you can spend billions building Yucca style
facilities ... plus you get bonus nuclear materials to watch over for a
couple tens of thousands of years to boot. I don't know what those wacky
environmental wackos could have against that. Gotcher thinkin' cap on
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com