[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[APD] Plus points
Gordon McLellan wrote:
> On 10/26/05, Stuart Halliday <stuart at stuarthalliday_com> wrote:
>> What do people expect from a MSN site?
>> It always dumbs down so much.
> True ... it is Microsoft's (MSN, NBC, et al) fault for not checking
> the facts before lending their name and reputation (or lack there-of)
> to the story.
> They (and other news sources) are just re-publishing and/or quoting an
> article written by LiveScience journalist Bjorn Carey.
> here: http://www.livescience.com/technology/051021_nano_light.html
What I like about this and other stories is that some day we'll be able to
have light sources of any shape size and colour. Probably fully controllable
in intensity and colour too.
Another big plus point will be safely. These will be DC powered rather than
AC, so no need for high dangerous voltages or broken glass hazards.
Therefore less of a fire risk.
Also DC electromagnetic fields don't travel as far as AC ones. So less
No reason why we couldn't have a light bulb of say 12 inches square with a
picture on it we control remotely as well. I'd like that.
It's getting the light efficiency up there with incandescents will be the
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com