[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Free speech
I agree Derek....I considered that dilemma. But as it stands now, the way
that is handled is by these large class action suits where the ones who take
the case are the legal firm(s) bringing on the class action. The actual
plaintiffs don't get that much compared to the final possible judgment.
So how bout those aquatic plants?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Parr" <derekparr at earthlink_net>
To: "aquatic plants digest" <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [APD] Free speech
> A good point, but if you look at the flip side, that solution could
> cause great trouble as well. It may make it harder for citizens to
> fight against large corporations who have great big teams of corporate
> lawyers. If one was risking having to pay for those guys as well your
> own lawyer/s.. . well.. that would suck wouldn't it. ;]
> -derek parr
> Terry Barber wrote:
> > What is more important is that this is one (of many) areas where our
> > system is way out of whack. A good start would be that if a preson sues
> > is found to be frovolous/without merit..........then they should have to
> > for the defendants legal fees. Right now, as this example shows, right
> > wrong, the Judicial system can be used to punish those who speak against
> > you.
> > Terry
> Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 - Release Date: 10/3/2005
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com