[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] light and the w/gal rule
Thomas Barr wrote:
> Folks want to do all sorts of math, that's fine...........but you do not get any good measurement of light that way, nor with Lumens, lux, and what have you.
I believe that almost all of the time aquarists have enough light over
the tank that these calculations never matter, but I am interested in
the edge cases. Think of me as the lazy guy at work who wants to see how
little he has to do before he gets into trouble, but instead of trying
to dodge work I'm trying to dodge electricity usage.
> Micro moles of photons/m^2/sec is the best unit overall for plant biology.
PAR = umoles/m^2/sec between 400 - 700 nm. In plain English, you're
counting the number of photons with a wavelength between 400 and 700 nm
that strike one square meter in one second. One unit of PAR is equal to
about 602 billion photons striking each square millimeter per second.
You know that, but just for the record and anyone reading this who might
PAR is the best measurement for photosynthetic purposes, but I defy you
to show me the PAR rating on the label of most of the lights we buy. I
couldn't even get Hamilton lighting to tell me anything about the bulbs
they sell other than the CRI. Not even lumens, lux, spectrum, or
anything else even related to the quality and/or quantity of light.
Using lumens is flawed, but you have to work with what's available to you.
> These run about 550-2000$, not something hobbyist care to indulge in.
I might spend the money on it just to publish the results here. That
would be a great deal of entertainment for me, and useful for others as
well. Nothing better than being able to add to the body of good
scientific data in the aquarium trade. We need it.
Of course I would probably get an Apogee if I have to fund it with my
personal cash, but perhaps there is an aquarium club that is interested
in getting a spherical Li-Cor.
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com