[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Re: substrate vs the water column
At 01:19 PM 12/22/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>TW: So, if the plants are indifferent to the location of
>nutrients, then why bother with any sort of fancy substrate at
>all?
>
>RJS: Aesthetics?
>
>By 'fancy' I meant specially formulated so it has things like,
>you know, 'power' in it.
>
>Or binding sites and micro-currents.
>
>Any of that stuff.
Welllll, it's not like people didn't grow plants with
fresh inert quartz aquarium gravel in the past 100 years.
I know I sure have.
--
/"\ / http://lists.aquaria.net
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / Killies, Crypts, Aponogetons
X AGAINST HTML MAIL / http://new.killi.net
/ \ AND POSTINGS / http://images.aquaria.net
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants