[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[APD] Re: Power Compacts

To: "aquatic plants digest" <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
Subject: [APD] Re: Power Compacts
From: "Andrew McLeod" <thefish at theabyssalplain_freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:17:43 -0000
In-reply-to: <D2B778E5C18D254D85D87C6FA98CEC9C02187981@lvkydcntemail5.lgeenergy.com>
List-help: <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=help>
List-id: aquatic plants digest <aquatic-plants.actwin.com>
List-post: <mailto:aquatic-plants@actwin.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants>, <mailto:aquatic-plants-request@actwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <D2B778E5C18D254D85D87C6FA98CEC9C02187981@lvkydcntemail5.lgeenergy.com>
User-agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3865)

On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:03:01 -0500, Wise, Nicholas <Nicholas_Wise at lgeenergy.com> wrote:

Wouldn't a IP 67 still just be water resistant? In reality, it would have to be rated an 8 to be truly water proof.

I think anything longer than 'short-term immersion' isn't going to be healthy for any concerned anyway... hot bulb hits cool water and all...

--
Andrew McLeod
thefish at theabyssalplain_freeserve.co.uk

This email was scanned carefully before transmission to remove any content, information or relevance.
_______________________________________________
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
http://www.actwin.com/mailman/listinfo/aquatic-plants

References:
- RE: [APD] Re: Power Compacts
  - From: Wise, Nicholas

Prev by Date: [APD] Re: Looking for Monosolenium tenerum
Next by Date: [APD] Lighting "siesta" period
Previous by thread: RE: [APD] Re: Power Compacts
Next by thread: Re: [APD] Swimming in a Nature Aquarium?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread