[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[APD] RE: K+ measurement/minimum
Tom Barr writes:
> Well minimum K+ relative to _what_?
> The ratio relative to other nutrients is a good
You're the king of "ranges"-- What's the bottom end?
Ratios are a fine answer to my question, but you're
micro-management argument below makes them a little
> N:P ratios for aquatic macrophytes is 10:1.
> A 1:1 ratio of N:K+ will lead to excess since most
> plants are 1.5N:1 K+.
Thanks-- This is what I wanted to know. My tanks'
successes and failures make a great deal more sense
> Mr Ghori suggested a 10:1:10, NPK ratio which is a
> nice easy simple number
> and seems like it should be adopted vs the older
> 20-30ppm of K and the
> range but this can be put into a context of a range
> also, just another way
> of saying it.
So, with such a tight tolerance, how do we avoid
Lemme see if I've got this right. If you add 5ppm N,
and 5ppm K after a water change, would you need to add
an additional 5ppm of K when (if) you replenish N? Or,
would K+ only be dosed once per week: 10 total ppm of
NO3 is dosed over the week-- 10ppm of K+ would be
dosed at the beginning?
> I think many folks seem to feel the minmum amounts
> of nutrients is somehow
> going to produce less algae.
> Nope.Good plant growth will though.
"Many Folks" weren't talking about algae-- Just plant
growth. Really just K+. But since you brought it up...
I believe that minimum amounts of macros do produce
less algae in the omnipresence of CO2, Fe, and trace
elements. Good plant growth alone is not enough to
retard algae growth.
> It also is a PITA to micro mange your tank so much
> attempting to outwit
> algae a little by dosing daily, skirting the minimum
> ranges with nutrients.
It's all micro-management-- Ranges, ratios, whatever
you'd like to call it. "Many folks" happen to think
that daily dosing is superior to 2-3 times a week, but
I'd hardly call that micromanagment. Further, daily
dosing has nothing to do with algae control-- at least
not for me.
Boy, this thread has wandered...
> It can be done well using a balanced fish load, less
> lighting or a non CO2
> method quite well, but these variable need to be
> taken into consideration
> when the aquarist wants to do a certain
> routine/method that is right for
That's good advice.
> Tom Barr
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com