[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APD] Re: CO2 usage in a sump versus non-sump
Nope. Poke around the site a bit more and you'll find a design for external
overflows that works great. I'd post the address, but Richard uses that
stupid frames address for everything so you can't index anything on the
site. The original design can also be adapted so the intake fits just over
the edge of the little baffle in the external part of the overflow.
----- Original Message -----
From: "S. Hieber" <shieber at yahoo_com>
To: "aquatic plants digest" <aquatic-plants at actwin_com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: [APD] Re: CO2 usage in a sump versus non-sump
> is strictly a standpipe setup intended for drilled tanks
> with bulkheads rather than external overflow boxes. Yes?
> Scott H.
> --- Justin Collins <jucollin at du_edu> wrote:
> > The primary down side I've heard to the CPR overflows is
> > that they have a
> > nasty habit of losing their siphon as compared to
> > traditional U-siphon ones.
> > There are solutions to the poilet sound that are cheap
> > and simple, such as
> > the overflow additions developed by Richard Durso.
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> Aquatic-Plants mailing list
> Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
Aquatic-Plants mailing list
Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com