Novak's goading

[Brian Harmon <harmon at msg_ucsf.edu>]

> Wether you address comments to Novak or not to me seems unimportant
> as compared to puposefully making comments to insult him or in some
> way infer a threat to him. This is in no way productive and only
> allows him to cloud the legal issues with his theories of conspiracey,
> as evidenced in his amendmant which goes into detail about your private
> comments to him and the overall impression it creates that we are a
> bunch of lunatics out to get him.

This what i've been saying for months.  Novak comes here
and trolls for angry flames, which he then lifts out of
context to present to the judge. If the judge sees 50
messages from list members detailing how we'll ruin him,
the judge may find it compelling.

Really, simply pointing out the barest facts of this
case tells people all they need to know.  I haven't
heard anyone say, "gee, this novak guy sounds all right,
what's his website again?" after hearing about a merchant
who sues former customers.

Try to realize that your comments here may have some
very negative consequences for others, namely the
defendants.