[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: That CO2 Source Thread
> >> Hmm...would that be what's known as "equilibrium"?...
> > Yes, once the states of the water and air are stable.
> I apologize for that, Scott - I was being facetious at the time.
> the site's seriously in need of an update (and a couple minor
> if you'll check http://www.mindspring.com/~nestor10/bcrb-fE4.htm
> others), you'll find I'm already well- versed in the necessary
> - -Y-
> David A. Youngker
> nestor10 at mindspring_com
Thanks for the consideration. No need to apologize to me, though.
It's often hard to know when someone is being serious, sardonic,
facetious in email -- and the audience is generally more than one
person with experts and novices in many different fields. So if I
seemed to be talking down to you, mea culpa, to you and all who saw it
that way. I didn't mean to suggest that you cannot do chemistry -- nor
that I am especially proficient there -- it wasn't one of my favorites
back at the university. This CO2 source thread is as much a logic
problem as a mathematical one as a chemical one. Please allow me to
apologize too; I sincerely bow to your expertise with moles.
Meanwhile, recalcitrant curmudgeon that I am, I keep insisting that
what comes out must have gone in -- not a daring position or one that
you or others take issue with. And others, I think, have pointed out
that it doesn't come from the air (nor pure H2O).
But others are doing a much better job on this thread than I am. So I
think I'll bow out and go back to the shrimp.
Hey Karen, have you tried watching for crepuscular or nocturnal
activity among the shrimp?
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com