[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: probable buffer?
- To: Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com
- Subject: Re: probable buffer?
- From: "Roger S. Miller" <rgrmill at rt66_com>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:29:00 -0600 (MDT)
- Delivered-To: fixup-Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com@fixme
- In-Reply-To: <200105291948.PAA29934 at actwin_com>
On Tue, 29 May 2001, J Miller wrote:
> My local tap water is sruprisingly pure - not too much of anything
> accoridng to the water report for March (for some reason, they are
> always a few months behind on their website). I am wondering if there
> might be a hidden buffer - something that isn't normally tested for.
> If not, would the pH drop one its own through aeration (ie, add CO2)?
> Here is doday's report:
> Hardness (ppm CaCO3) 167
> pH 7.80
> Alkalinity (mg/L) 112
Alkalinity at 112 mg/l is fairly well-buffered. That comes out to a
little over 6 degrees alkalinity. That alkalinity plus a pH of 7.8 gives
you about 3.5 mg/l CO2 from the tap. If you aerate a sample of the water
then the pH should increase. Unplanted tanks and planted tanks with only
slow growth but without added CO2 usually have 3-4 mg/l CO2. You might
not see much difference in the pH of your tap water and the pH in an