[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crypts and Chains(swords)
- To: <Aquatic-Plants at actwin_com>
- Subject: Re: Crypts and Chains(swords)
- From: Thomas Barr <tcbiii at earthlink_net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 14:39:53 -0700
- In-Reply-To: <200104081948.PAA27193 at actwin_com>
- User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
> I have two plant varieties that consistently get bigger than I *thought*
> their species were supposed to get.
So did Jack:)
> First is E. tenellus. I have two varieties. One is the small, reddish
> plant pictured in Amano's books. The other is a narrow-leafed green
> plant that get's larger. In fact, *way* larger. The plants I pulled
> out of my 55 today were 8 inches high with leaves over 10 inches long.
> They were reaching for the light a little, but I have the same plants in
> other tanks where they get good light and consistently grow to a height
> of 5-6 inches. I also have E. quadricostatus. E. quad. is about the
> same height, but has wider leaves.
They will grow lower if you have more light, less shaded, same is true for a
number of plants. If you had say 4 watts a gallon or so in a 18inch deep
tank they would stay fairly short, perhaps 4 inches high. The redder "micro"
even less. It seems to get about 4 max at lower lighting but the other does
get tall. The micro is not commercially available so this is seldom seen so
far. A number plant folks have it here in the USA. I think Neil brought some
back from Japan.
> It's also not a sagittaria; I've had
> dwarf sag before and their roots are different.
Tips of the leaves are different also. Sags are/tend to be more blunt.
> Is this relatively large, narrow-leafed chain sword really E. tenellus,
> or could it be some other species? Rataj and Horeman describe an "E.
> angustifolius" that sounds like this big tenellus.
See Neil's article in PAM. It gives a good overview of these groups and
> Second is Cryptocoryne "willisii". I thought this plant was a small,
> docile foreground plant.
If it's the real C x willisii is only 2 inches or so tall. The C x willisii
lucens is about 2 times bigger but very close.
> Today I tore out my entire Frankenstein's
> monster of a stand and replanted just a few individuals. The plants
> were as much as 10 inches high and varied in color from light green to
> bronze. The leaf blades are narrow and lanceolate with slightly
> undulate margins. The petioles were about as long or slighly longer
> than the blades. The roots were a white, brittle and tangled mess.
> Plantlets arose from the base of the larger plants and from runners that
> extended as much as 18 inches across the tank. All in all it looks a
> bit like C. wendtii's little brother, but I've never seen C. wendtii put
> out long runners.
Doesn't sound anything like it.
Some very slight color in high light but I doubt this is the case here. I'd
go with your wendtii or perhaps walkeri grouping. C x willisii stays green.
Put it out in good light and see if it colors up.